WILA 9 Hours 9 Persons 9 Doors

In WIHILA 999, I talked about some of the things a game can do to make a story interesting and relatable, right up to what is probably the most important thing – the interplay between the mechanics of the game and the story. Turns out I wasn’t off the mark when I thought 999 would do this well.

So, what is the relationship between the story and the game? I’ve rewritten this paragraph something like seven hundred twenty-three times now (approximately) with anecdotes, explanations, links, questions and examples, but I’ll save space and get to the point, and we can all have a nice discussion about it later if you’re interested. The story and game mechanics can each grab your attention, immerse or engage you, sometimes in different ways. Stories can make sense of game rules, and game rules can give interactive shape to stories. If the two are integrated well, the game rules (or mechanics) emphasise the narrative so I can easily process it, and am not sparing brain space for the two separately. Meanwhile the story engages me (mentally and emotionally) in the rules, the challenges, the interaction and the goals (all of which are fundamental elements of a game). On the other hand, if the game and story are not integrated well, the mechanics distract me from the narrative or easily abstract away from it (i.e. – the mechanics have very little to do with the story), so I quickly forget or ignore the plot. The story, in turn, at best has little connection to my goals and the challenges which I must overcome, and at worst leaves me confused about or frustrated with the rules and how I am supposed to interact with the game.

And if you want my two cents (which seems likely given that you’re here reading), 999 rocks up an impressive harmony between mechanics and story.

Mechanics Serving the Story

Beating at the heart of 999 is a great visual novel. Besides the puzzles, which ask you to sit up and pay attention to the surroundings (and the characters accompanying you), the bulk of the ‘mechanics’ of the game are quite simply scrolling through text, saving your game, and making choices throughout the story. The first few are perhaps a bit obvious, but important (and more on the nuances of those choices a bit later on).

Remember not so long ago when I said the game rules can emphasise the narrative? The way in which the player controls and explores 999 is interesting in that it endeavours to be convenient, but not overly convenient. In doing so, it kept me engaged (not bored of re-reading text or redoing puzzles), but also always kept the story close, difficult to just forget or abstract away. The experience of playing 999, at least to me, means playing through the story multiple times; this is not for so-called ‘replay value’, it’s for actually uncovering the full game. This inevitably means repeating copious amounts of dialogue. 999 let’s you super-fast forward (emphasis on super-fast) through previously seen dialogue, but not skip it entirely. The game can never really be ‘failed’, but never lets you backtrack and doesn’t let you leave a breadcrumb trail of saves like some other games. The puzzles are designed such that a repeated puzzle is often trivial to complete quickly after you’ve solved it once (instead of having many time consuming parts), but is never skippable entirely, and often contains important (and interesting) character dialogue. It doesn’t scare you off by wasting your time, but it still demands your time and gets you invested.

On top of all this, an innocuous list of icons on the save screen indicating the potential endings serves to make clear the scope of the game for the player (it doesn’t end with just one playthrough, nor does it go on forever with mountains of possible endings), while quickly setting them on a hunt for new endings as collectibles.

So the tools the player is given to explore the narrative – the mechanics – serve to keep the player focused and in the story through multiple playthroughs. This is for naught, though, if the story doesn’t really act as an engaging game beyond the integrated puzzles.

The Story Serving the Game

Let’s talk about those choices you can make for a second, especially what the designers can do to make those choices interesting for a game. Sure, a handful of choices in a narrative may have a goal: a ‘good ending’ for the player, or some kind of happy ending for the characters (the ones you like anyways). However, if there is no way to inform those choices (like if putting your seatbelt on in a car gets you killed by some fluke), or the ‘correct’ choices are trivially easy to make (think about every time you find yourself yelling at a TV character to ‘do the right thing’ instead of the ‘clearly-going-to-come-back-to-haunt-you thing’), then it can hardly be said to have challenge or interaction. I’m hardly keeping you in suspense here, 999 packed in exactly what the story needed to suck me in; not just as a solid narrative, but as a real game.

As I’ve mentioned, the story of 999 is such that it cannot be completed (at least not very satisfyingly) in one playthrough, and probably not in two or three (though luck, incredible insight, or a guide can obviously prove me wrong here). During these playthroughs, I started out knowing nothing, then steadily progressed through the story, meeting the relevant characters, understanding the setting, discovering the major transformative choices (trust me, they’re pretty obvious), and finding out what can go wrong. All of this went on while I enjoyed the challenge of some well crafted puzzles and felt some level of achievement by collecting different ‘bad endings’ (yay, brutal murder bingo!).

Some of these choices were arbitrary when I was clueless. This might sound like it’s in direct contradiction to what I was just saying about being able to inform your choices, but it works here for a number of reasons. First, none of these choices lead to meaningless dead-ends: they all provide character and story development, which ultimately is the feedback required to inform your choices later. Second, these choices are highlighted throughout the story, making them easier to identify and manage. Personally, I’m a fan of charts and maps on a notepad, but there’s not so much that you couldn’t just keep it up in the old noggin. Third, the mechanics I mentioned in the previous section (fast forwarding, quick-to-complete repeat puzzles, and an explicit list of collectible endings) ensure you spend most of your time figuring out your next move and piecing together the mystery (the fun and interesting stuff). Finally, I should point out that it’s not just acceptable that some of these choices are arbitrary at first: it’s appropriate. If I could make an educated guess at a ‘correct path’ on my first try without really exploring the story, then it wouldn’t be much of a challenge. However, these larger choices only mark the beginning of the narrative maze presented by 999.

As I explored these few, large, semi-arbitrary choices (encouraged by, if nothing else, the promise of new puzzles and different endings), I was equal parts pleased and mortified to discover many smaller, less obvious character-related choices. It’s not clear at first how much these choices affect the overall game (in fact, I think it was pretty clear they do next to nothing most of the time) but the potential was there for many subtle choices, quickly cutting off the prospect of brute-force exploring every possible choice combination (at least for my level of tolerance for brute forcing solutions). In later playthroughs, however, armed with the knowledge gained of the setting, characters and options, I had an inkling, an idea or two, of how I might overcome these trials. It was an awesome ride right to the end, made all the better by the fact that I got there by interacting with and exploring the story, learning, and rising to the challenge presented by both the story and the game. I’m getting pumped just writing about it!

The Good Ending

I could continue blabbing, but I’d much rather hear your take on this topic. To recap, I felt the mechanics were designed to keep my focus on the story while keeping me engaged. The story then provides the challenges (how do I avoid this horrible event), the back-and-forth interaction with the player (information gained through exploration), and the goals (both the interim checkpoints that keep you going and the overall finish line). As always, I’m interested to hear what games come to mind when you read this: both games that could learn from design like this and games that have done as well as I seem to think 999 has done. Also, if you played 999, did you feel the same way? When you read this, do you agree with the basic points (whether or not you’ve played it) or do you think your game/story ‘sweet spot’ lies elsewhere? Discuss down below!

And here’s the secret ending of this post: this is actually also WIHILA Zero’s Escape (the sequel to 999 which I’ve not yet played). What better way is there to test and see if all the things I give the game credit for are truly qualities the makers purposefully designed than seeing how well the sequel hits the same notes, and what it changes up? I’ve got high expectations, and I hope it not only meets them, but shows me some kind of evolution or improvement I’m not expecting.


8 thoughts on “WILA 9 Hours 9 Persons 9 Doors

    1. connorbros Post author

      Hm, that’s a tricky question, because I’m not sure I think it is necessarily satisfying. I recently started playing The Walking Dead, another acclaimed game with a lot of narrative choice, and I quickly started getting really worried and stressed about my choices and the fact that they may or may not have consequences. I still need to give it some time to see how everything pans out, but, at least for me, I think the really satisfying thing is not just feeling like I’ve interacted with the story, but that somehow my personality/preferences/choices have shaped the story.

      I’ll try to summarise my thoughts on the matter. It’s not enough to me to make a choice and see some consequences – there needs to be some kind of logic to it so that my choices at least kind of take the story in the direction I want. If I really want a happy ending, and my choices are informed attempts at getting there, it kind of sucks if I’m ‘rewarded’ with my favorite characters dying or something similar.

      The tricky bit is in making the choices still be compelling and interesting. Quick and relatively transparent feedback (so you really understand what effects your choices are having), and not having to live for a long time with a choice before having an opportunity to set things right (either by restarting and skipping repetitive bits, or by somehow ‘rectifying’ a choice you don’t like after the fact) are really important to me. With these, a game can have a few near-arbitrary or subtle choices without feeling like the choices are just there to laugh at the player for thinking they had some kind of control. I can even imagine a game where, for every choice you make, the opposite happens, but as long as the game is consistent in this and the player can figure it out and then not have to live with a load of bad choices, it could still be enjoyable (and probably quite humourous!)

      Hopefully with a bit more persistence I’ll feel satisfied with choices in The Walking Dead. I’ve gone on for a while though here, what were your thoughts when you posed the question? Narrative choice can be such a difficult thing to make satisfying in situations where you’re not relying on ‘quick replaying’ to rectify situations – like in D&D, for example.


  1. JackOfHearts

    More of a genuine question. For example, I’ve played games before where, near the end of the game, something significant happens, and I realize it’s because of a choice I made early in the game – and that realization sort of leads to a “how cool!” moment. But I’m torn between that and, having made a decision I didn’t realize was important, or was going to lead down a path I didn’t like, not being able to get out from those rails until much later in the game – or at all.

    And I’m also thinking about it from the perspective of incorporating some “origin feats” into Lost Worlds, and trying to figure out their mechanical impact.

    1. connorbros Post author

      Hm, I guess the overlap between what I worry about and the fun that you’re talking about might be in little things that don’t make a big difference but acknowledge choices and personal expression? Like when a game asks for a favourite colour early on, and then the wallpaper of a room later is that colour (that’s kind of a contrived example, but I think illustrates my basic meaning).

      Or maybe when it’s less a choice and more the presence or absence of an action: the player could have done Action X (in addition to whatever they were doing at the time), but no particular attention is called to Action X, and later on it’s never pointed out that the player -didn’t- do Action X, there is just pure upside if they did do it. The player who doesn’t think to do Action X hopefully never really feels bad for having not done it, and the player who does feels rewarded. The downloadable content in Deus Ex comes to mind.

      I realise this may not be really relevant for ‘origin feats’, but they are just a few situations that come to mind that toe the line between giving players that joy of ‘Hey, the game is paying attention to me’ and having unbreakable rails for the player. Were you thinking of some feats which would constitute a background/origin-story of sorts for each player, and using these to guide story threads but also have some mechanical value?


      1. JackOfHearts

        There are two flavors:

        1. Character Creation Feat. For example:

        Base of Operations
        You have a base of operations in the immediate area. Create a description and/or map of your base of operations. The base of operations should be suitable to the background and level (if starting characters higher than level 1) of the character. Examples might include an old tavern, a one or two story house, a hidden area in the sewers, an abandoned warehouse, etc.

        2. Flavor

        Choose an astrological sign. Based on your choice, the impact of a later story event may impact you differently.

        OR, choose a Meyers Briggs personality: ESTJ for example. Based on your choice, various NPCs will react to you differently.

      2. connorbros Post author

        We’ve been playing with something similar (more like a background ‘your place in the world’ style thing) in DnDNext. Having one or two clear but niche ‘functional’ attachments has helped at least make it feel more relevant (even if it still is heavily up to the DMs discretion, and mostly relevant in how the player roleplays it). Anyways, my overall point is I think it’s a solid idea. =)


  2. Pingback: Choices that Matter Later & Story Games | Lost Worlds

  3. wylliamjudd

    This went in a different direction than I expected. I don’t expect narrative choice in video games, just like I don’t expect it when reading a book or watching a movie. I do appreciate when a story is executed well throughout the experience of the game. With that being said, narrative choice is an excellent way to take advantage of the medium. I have never played a game where it’s done well, because the emphasis winds up being on your choices rather than how great the story is. It sounds like this game executed it well.

    One thing that this post reminded me of was travel in MMOs. If it takes too long to get somewhere, that can be boring. But if you can just teleport everywhere, it takes so much away from the immersion into the game world, and the sense of scope to the world. I like the idea of fast-forwarding through pieces of the story you’ve already played, without having the power to skip them entirely.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s